What they Say
|
May 2010 Barnsley Planners Do Care About Pollution... but not ours! Read Here |
| October 2nd 2009 Dearne Valley Weekender |
|
The group behind plans for a £77 million waste processing plant have hit back at suggestions that it will be a health hazard. The Barnsley Doncaster Rotherham Waste Partnership are upset that campaigners believe a deal has been done to site a rubbish burning incinerator at Bolton Road in Manvers. But they do not deny it will be built there! and with out proper consultation! Members of the partnership moved this week to reassure residents that a decision on what treatment equipment would be used and where was still a long way off and insisted that they would have full control over what shape the plant would take. Not according to their own officers read here>> But Cllr Richard Russell, chairman of the waste partnership, said: “It is scaremongering to suggest that any future development would be anything less than absolutely safe and rigorously controlled to ensure meeting the highest possible operating standards laid down by legislation. "Then build it in Rotherham!" “Whatever proposal is put forward, will be subject to planning permission. “It will have to meet the most stringent World Health Organisation regulations on public protection. “The design and operation will be scrutinised by the Environment Agency, (EA) before it can be granted an Environmental Permit. “The plant will also be continuously monitored by the operator, the Environment Agency and the BDR Waste Partnership. “People should be reassured that public health and safety is the first priority for the partnership 'but' like all local authorities across the UK we have to act now to tackle the issue of what to do with leftover household waste.” Why include a 'but' does it mean that public health and safety is secondary to the local authorities need to act now? Campaigners last week cited information from a recent report which looked at the possible health risks posed by incinerator emissions. Cllr Russell said: “In the same week, the UK’s Health Protection Agency (HPA) published its own report, which said precisely the opposite. “The point is that there is so much information out there, you need to be very careful about claiming just one opinion to be the authoritative view. The Partnership and Councillor Richard Russell Cleary hasn't bothered to read our pages! Our claim has 360 journal references and they can be checked here the HPA document has been done by their own consultants! Tell him here “Whatever is finally chosen will be subject to the most stringent regulations and monitoring standards. All have already been successfully used in either the UK or Europe.” Two competing bidders will be announced in December at which point more information as possible will be made public about both proposals and people will have the opportunity to express their views. Our view is 'If it safe.. then put in the middle of Rotherham - Barnsley or Doncaster!
|
| September 4th 2009 BDR Waste Partnership Team |
|
The current position with the BDR PFI Project is that four leading waste industry specialist companies have put forward their proposals for dealing with leftover waste. They are:
|
What They Don't Say
|
Why Manvers is the preferred site by the Partnership Team and the District Councils Why they have failed so far to conduct a proper and effective consultation in the communities affected the Proposed Site on Bolton Road Does 'may well be subject to heat treatment' mean that they really do not know what they have tendered for or that they will accept what a profit motivated commercial company tells them what is in their/our best interest e.g. an incinerator. Their website states " We are currently carrying out consultation with local people across the three local authorities about a list of possible strategic sites which could be used for the treatment of all waste. However Rotherham's website says "Public Meeting 15th July 2009, on potential site in Manvers, Wath upon Dearne, Rotherham. Consultation Period now closed." Were you consulted? If not why not?.... They haven't said! |